Life GPS Try it on iPhone

Press

Stories inside Life GPS

Life GPS is a human operating system on the person's side — and that is not one story. Choose the angle: AI and agents, security, family, education, people, business, the founder.

It touches attention, children, privacy, relationships, institutions, money — and the way technology meets one human life. Every block below is a story that already exists inside the product, with the source page and, where it matters, the honest status. Facts, descriptions and quotes for use are at the bottom. Nothing here needs you to read the site first.

Quick links: Product · Security model · Protocol · Human Antivirus · Education · Founder · What exists today · Contact

Every digital system has a security layer. Your life has no one of its own. Your phone protects itself. Your bank protects the money. The AI company protects the model. In 2025 UK banks stopped £1.68 billion of unauthorised fraud — and people lost £576 million by authorising payments themselves, because someone convinced them to. The lock worked; the person still lost. Life GPS is building the side that stays with the person across all of those systems — and publishes what it protects, what it does not yet, and how to break it. → /security-model · angles #1, #3, #6

A father building for the world his daughters are entering. The founder says one of the reasons Life GPS exists is simple: he has two daughters, sees first-hand how consumption affects them, and wants technology to help them live without getting lost in whatever the world becomes. Five years of building came before asking anyone to look. → /founder · angle #18

Your phone protects itself. Who protects you? Cybersecurity protects machines from attacks. The Human Antivirus asks what happens after permission is granted: is the system that is already talking to you still working for you? Attention, pressure, manipulation, overload — and the first thing it has to protect you from is the human antivirus itself. → /antivirus · angles #8, #15, #16

AI got smarter. Now it is getting hands. Software no longer only answers; it buys, books, applies and negotiates. The agent race is crowded. Almost every entrant builds the agent. Life GPS is building the independent side of the person those agents would have to meet — what each may know, do and spend, and whether the result still fits the person's life. → /security-model · angles #2, #4, #5

What if education began with what the child is trying to build? Not another AI tutor fitted more tightly to the child. A reform that gathers knowledge, people, equipment and institutions around a real direction — and has to work first in an ordinary school, with existing teachers, before it earns a building. → /education · angles #22–#25

A protocol for how the world should meet a person. A bank, a doctor, an employer and an agent each see one piece; today the person carries the connections by hand. The proposal: an open protocol for what a system may know, do, for how long, and what comes back to the person's side — in public review now. → /protocol · angles #34–#36

AI should know when another person is the better answer. Sometimes a model helps; sometimes only someone who has lived through the same thing can. A network with no feed and no audience, where a match connects a need to experience — not two profiles to each other. Built; opens with the first round. → /network · angles #26–#28

All story angles

AI & agents · Security · The person · Family & children · Education · People & society · Business & institutions · Founder & why now

AI & agents

1. Every digital system has a security layer. Your life has no one of its own. Phones protect the device. Banks protect the transaction. AI companies protect the model. Life GPS asks what security looks like when the protected object is the person — across all of them. → /security-model

2. AI got smarter. Now it is getting hands. Software no longer only answers; it buys, books, applies, negotiates. The agent race is crowded. Life GPS is building the independent side of the person those agents would have to meet. → /security-model · /now

3. The payment can be authenticated. The person can still lose. In 2025 UK banks prevented £1.68 billion of unauthorised fraud — and people lost £576 million by authorising payments themselves after being convinced to (UK Finance, 2026). Securing the transaction does not secure the human outcome. → /security-model#waves

4. MCP connects AI to tools. What connects the tools to the person? For builders: agent protocols carry capabilities and actions. Life GPS works on the other side — the person's limits, context and interests that any tool or agent has to meet. An analogy, not the same protocol. → /security-model#business · /protocol

5. The better the agents get, the more the person needs a side of their own. Life GPS does not need to beat the best model or the best agent. It treats them as capabilities and executors — and asks who holds the person's side above all of them. → /competitors

Security

6. A security model where the protected domain is a human life. Not the model, the account or the database: identity, money, time, attention, relationships, goals, authority and continuity — twenty-six areas, each with its status, because an operating system does not get to choose only the easy parts. → /security-model#all

7. One person. One side. Many executors. You establish your side once; a bank, a shop, an agent or a model comes to it and asks what it may do. It gets a decision — not the life that produced it. → /security-model#building

8. The most dangerous participant is the protector. The system that knows your vulnerabilities in order to defend them is the most powerful instrument of influence over you. Life GPS writes protection from Life GPS into its own design. → /antivirus#paradox · /security-model

9. "Do not believe us. Break it." The security page says, in so many words, that the systems are not claimed to be secure — and publishes the gaps and unfinished parts instead of hiding them. → /security-model#today · /security

The person

10. AI can answer almost anything. Who helps a person decide what matters? The problem is no longer access to knowledge. It is deciding which possibility belongs in this life now — without one goal quietly eating the others. → /product

11. Every app can be right. Your life can still lose. The finance app optimises money, the work agent optimises work, the health app optimises health. Nobody is responsible for the sum, because nobody sees it. Life GPS is built for exactly that conflict. → /security-model#missing · /product

12. One life, not a dozen competing plans. Money, health, work, love, family, friends, learning, faith, direction — and everything in between — affect one another. Life GPS holds all of it in one context, in the proportions the person sets. → /product

13. One next step instead of another hundred recommendations. The internet is full of advice. Life GPS reduces it to one understandable next action, with the reason and the trade-off shown — one function of the operating system, not the whole of it. → /product

14. A person is not a profile. People change; a picture captured once is wrong within months. Life GPS keeps a living model of the person that changes with their actions and corrections — and stays theirs. → /avatar

15. The Human Antivirus. Cybersecurity protects machines from attacks. The human antivirus asks a different question: when a system is already authorised and already talking to you, is it still working for you? Attention, pressure, manipulation, overload — including from us. → /antivirus

16. The product that wants you to leave sooner. No feed, no posts, no unread counters, no streak to protect. A short session is a good session. → /antivirus

17. The internet as a resource inside your life, not a place you disappear into. Knowledge, services and people enter the route when they fit — and leave again. → /antivirus · /product

Family & children

18. A father building for the world his daughters are entering. The founder says one of the reasons Life GPS exists is simple: he has two daughters, sees first-hand how consumption affects them, and wants technology to help them live without getting lost in whatever the world becomes. → /founder · /security-model

19. Who protects a child when AI is easier to talk to than a parent? Children will use AI. The question is whether the architecture rewards dependence — or returns the child to real people when people matter more. → /antivirus · /network

20. Parents should not have to become security engineers. The European Commission's own finding on TikTok says the screen-time tools are easy to dismiss and the parental controls need extra time and skills from parents. Protection that families have to operate manually still leaves the burden on the family. → /security-model#attention

21. A child's consent is not an adult checkbox made smaller. Children and guardians need representation and changing authority, not adult consent copied onto a minor. → /protocol/review

Education

22. What if education began with what the child is trying to build? Instead of fitting the learner into a class, a subject and a fixed route, the environment gathers knowledge, people, equipment and institutions around a real direction. → /education · status: a published proposal

23. Not another AI tutor. An AI tutor personalising a curriculum is the old system fitted more tightly to the child. The larger question is whether technology can assemble the real world around the learner instead of another interface. → /education

24. A reform that has to work first in an ordinary school. Existing teachers, existing rooms, the phones people already have. No new building before the idea has earned one. → /education

25. Age does not have to be the organising principle. Children are grouped by age; capability and interest are not. What happens when direction, project and need organise learning instead? → /education

People & society

26. AI should know when another person is the better answer. Sometimes a model helps. Sometimes only someone who has lived through the same thing can. → /network · status: built, opens with the first round

27. A network without an audience. No feed to keep alive, no followers as status, no catalogue of people. The way in is "what do I want right now" — and a match connects a need to experience, not two profiles to each other. → /network · /security-model#people

28. AI as mediator, not replacement. Before a hard conversation, prepare both people or surface what they are missing — without becoming either of them. → /network#mediator

29. Faith is not an error to optimise away. A human operating system cannot treat faith, meaning or held values as inefficiencies because another metric looks better. → /faith

30. Meet the fundamentals first, then the person. Today you meet someone first and find out who they are afterwards — often after the part that costs. Life GPS reverses the order. → /love

31. Women's World: infrastructure whose content is decided by the women inside it. Not a product deciding what women should care about — a structure where the women in it choose the areas, the participation and the people who shape it. → /women

Business & institutions

32. The business gets the decision it needs, not the life that produced it. A shop needs to know whether a purchase can proceed. A bank needs the confirmations a loan requires. An agent needs to know what it may do. None of them needs every part of the person's life. → /security-model#business

33. Placement cannot be bought. Relevance is decided by the person's route; nobody can buy a position in it. A system where position is for sale is a feed with extra steps. → /partners

34. A protocol for how the world meets a person. What a system may know, what it may do, for what purpose and how long, and what returns to the person's side afterwards — proposed as an open protocol and put out for review. → /protocol · status: public review draft

35. "I want a home" is one human decision and a dozen institutional systems. Bank, insurer, property, notary, state, school, commute, work. The world splits one intention into systems; the protocol asks whether the sum can stay with the person. → /protocol

36. Why should a digital service need every part of your life to answer one question? You would never give every shop the password to your bank account. The bank keeps the account and returns a decision. The rest of your digital life should work the same way. → /security-model

Founder & why now

37. Five years of building before asking the world to look. Not assembled around this year's trend: the architecture, the constraints and the failures were opened for review after the system existed. → /founder · /product

38. Published principles. A fixed set of limits on what the system may do to a person — published so they can be held against the running app. → /ideology#constraints

39. A founder who does not want AI to become the most important relationship in your life. Life GPS uses AI heavily and builds human connection as a first-class part of the operating system. → /network · /founder

40. The human side of AI is becoming an infrastructure category. Pro-human AI is moving from values language into organisations, standards and code. Life GPS is one concrete attempt to make that side run around one person. → /research/human-side-of-ai · /now

The founder's open letter

In the pursuit of consumption, success and the plain necessity of earning a living, we forgot the simplest question: what it means to be a human being, and what we are here for. Now AI is beginning not only to advise you but to act for you. On the technology side, we are building infrastructure of enormous power. On your side, a comparable layer is only starting to form.

Read the open letter — the position, in the founder's own words.

In short

Life GPS is a human operating system on the person's side. Security is its kernel; models, agents, services and people are capabilities around the person's own side. All of a life in one context, turned into one next step with the reasoning shown; AI that connects people rather than replacing them; a living model of the person; a fixed set of published constraints. First users are testing it before launch. Founded by Alexandru Goroh. WAADSU Inc. (Delaware, USA) and WAADSU s.r.o. (Czechia). Raising $3M at a $25M post-money cap.

Facts

Description, 25 words

Life GPS is a human operating system on the person's side: every part of a life in one context, security as its kernel, one next step with its reasoning, under published constraints.

Description, 100 words

Life GPS is a five-year, founder-led attempt to build a human operating system on the person's side — with security as its kernel, and models, agents, services and people as capabilities around the person's own side. It holds every part of a life in one context — health, money, relationships, work, family, faith, learning, friends, meaning — together with the time a person actually has, and produces one next step with the reasoning shown. Where another human being is more useful than a model, it connects people instead of substituting for them. Underneath sits a model of the person that changes as they do. All of it runs inside published principles that govern the system and can be checked.

Quotes available for use

All three are the founder's own words and should be attributed as such.

"The more a system can do for a person, the less it should control that person." — Alexandru Goroh, founder, Life GPS

"Publicity isn't my thing — I'm calmer behind the scenes. But someone has to tell you about the product." — Alexandru Goroh, founder, Life GPS

"Together we will make progress work for the person — rather than the person work endlessly for progress." — Alexandru Goroh, founder, Life GPS

What we ask of anyone writing about us

Where something is built but not yet open, or is a direction rather than a product, the page says so on the line. We would rather be described accurately as smaller than be described generously as finished. Where something is blocked, this site says so — including on the pages where it hurts.

Media contact

hello@lifegpsos.com · Logo, screenshots and the image from /security-model on request · Written interviews with the founder. Point to the angle number above and we answer with the source, the code and the gaps.