Technology can do more and more. What does that make possible for people?
The world has learned to measure speed, profit, production and computing. But how do we know that people can actually live better, choose, love and achieve what they set out to do?
We have built a world of extraordinary possibilities. Now it matters to connect them with a person's life.
We are developing two independent directions:
Life GPS — Human OS. An independent side for the person, accounting for their whole life, goals, circumstances, relationships, decisions and consequences. AI is a tool. The person sets the direction.
A common world language and shared pool of capabilities. A universal foundation through which independent people, companies, AI systems and organisations could understand, discover and combine the world's knowledge, skills, methods and capabilities.
A side of their own for the person. A common language of capabilities for the world.
Together, they could shorten the path from a person's need directly to knowledge, specialists, manufacturers and solutions — without unnecessary intermediaries. The common language is intended for independent use — Life GPS is just one of its possible users.
AI is moving from advice to action. That makes the question of who preserves a person's goals, control and interests increasingly important.
The personal core of Life GPS is already being tested on iPhone. The common language, pool and external interaction are in development.
The world split everything into apps. But a person's life is one whole.
Work affects health, money affects relationships, today's decisions affect tomorrow's possibilities. Life GPS is building the person's own side, helping bring all of this together around the life they want to build.
A victory in one part of life can become a defeat in another.
More income can cost health, and a completed plan can cost time with loved ones. It matters to see the consequences for the whole life and check whether a decision brought the person closer to what they actually want.
While the world collects information about you for itself, start collecting it for yourself.
Banks, employers, platforms and AI systems create different accounts of you — each for its own purposes. Living Avatar is developing as a person's own digital history: their context, experience, thinking, decisions and changes. The goal is to let the person decide what to keep, correct and share, and with whom.
Preserve not only what you did, but how you got there.
Humanity preserves books, photographs and inventions, but often loses the way of thinking itself. We want people to be able to accumulate this experience for themselves and, in the future, carry selected parts into compatible systems and pass them on to others by their own choice.
A system can get better and better at predicting your past self — and worse at understanding who you want to become. A living model should notice change and follow the person, rather than return them to the past.
What becomes possible when the world can understand what it already knows and can do?
Knowledge, methods, skills and technologies are described differently across thousands of systems. We are developing a common language that lets independent participants understand their composition, connections and conditions of use — and discover combinations that previously went unnoticed.
The solution you need may already exist. What remains is to help you find each other.
The shared pool is intended to connect compatibly described capabilities with real people, organisations, resources and requests. The world could accumulate not only knowledge, but verified experience of how different participants achieve results together, checking applicability in every new case.
From a person's need directly to those who can create a solution.
AI can reduce unnecessary intermediary operations. The common language would let independent systems understand the capabilities of manufacturers, specialists and other participants. The shared pool is intended to connect these capabilities with real offers and needs. Life GPS could use this infrastructure on the person's side — but the infrastructure does not depend on Life GPS.
People gain more direct access to solutions; their creators gain access to real needs: from an existing service to individual design and manufacturing. Useful intermediaries retain their role.
Why reconstruct billions of times what the world has already learned?
A shared, verifiable foundation could reduce repeated searching, research and coordination. More time, energy and computing could be directed towards what humanity has not yet created.
Organisations have their own systems. A person should have their own side of the interaction.
Receiving help should not mean giving away the whole context of your life. We propose developing rules together through which independent parties exchange the information and authority they need, retaining their roles and responsibilities.
More capable AI must not mean more power over a person.
Less disclosed data, less authority, shorter access and less required trust. Technology should be able to do useful things without receiving unlimited access to a person.
Who protects a person from technologies that formally do everything right?
Even an authorised action can capture attention, manipulate choice or undermine other life priorities. Human Antivirus is being developed to protect the person themselves — including from Life GPS's own mistakes and pressure.
All the world's connections in your pocket — with living people behind them.
Your people, with whom you can be yourself. Real relationships, understanding and reciprocal help: someone has already walked your path, and someone else needs your experience. AI should help people find each other and reach understanding — without rating human worth.
What one person has learned can open a path for another.
We are researching how to preserve methods, conditions and results for reuse with participants' permission. Passing on experience complements live help, preserving the distinction between a described method and the person's own participation.
Learning can begin with the person and what they want to do.
Abilities, curiosity and real tasks connect with knowledge, mentors and practice. Education becomes part of lifelong development — with application in a world that keeps changing.
Return time for relationships, development and what matters to the person themselves.
Love. Understand what matters about each other earlier, preserving people's freedom to define their relationships. Explore →
Women's World. Connect women's different experiences into support and shared action, preserving each person's individuality. Explore →
Faith. Account for a person's faith, beliefs and meanings without defining them on their behalf. Explore →
EXISTING COMPANIES AND ECOSYSTEMS
New value can emerge between what has already been built.
Companies, specialists and institutions retain their systems. More appropriate demand and new combinations of services could strengthen individual products, entire ecosystems and investment portfolios — because the person gets more value.
See one another — and the possibilities where our work intersects.
We bring professional conversations together to connect knowledge, experience and engineering capabilities. We want to develop and test new infrastructure together, working practically rather than postponing the work for years.
If technology is created for people, people should influence its future.
One person — one equal voice, regardless of money or popularity. A company created for people should give them the opportunity to influence its development and participate in the value they help create. The participation model is evolving.
We need to limit our own power and evaluate real consequences for life — including results that contradict our expectations. Develop shared rules and ways to verify them openly, while preserving people's personal boundaries.
Life GPS is a human operating system. Its working personal core, built around a person's whole life, is already available for testing on iOS through public TestFlight access.
Its architecture is designed to connect goals, circumstances, relationships, decisions and their consequences across a person's life. Keeping those connections on the person's side requires coordination with the people, knowledge, services and institutions their life depends on.
Confusing whole-life scope with a lack of focus is an error of analysis. Accounting for the whole of a person's life does not mean building every capability ourselves or launching everything at once. We connect existing capabilities around the person and develop and launch the system in stages.
This is why our wider work includes a team, operating infrastructure, international professional collaboration and the Human-Side Protocol for interaction between independent participants. A separate common world language is being developed for independent use; Life GPS is one of its possible users.
The planned commercial iOS launch and personal subscriptions form the initial commercial entry into that wider architecture.
An individual feature may resemble something in another application. A comparison limited to that resemblance leaves out how the operating system connects a person's life, preserves their choices and coordinates capabilities around them.
The working core, the wider architecture and the route to market are connected. None of them alone describes the whole.
What already exists and what we are building next
The chat guides you through setup; ongoing daily guidance has not yet launched.
The human network is built but not yet open between people. The interface for inspecting and correcting the Avatar model is not ready yet. Portability, the common language, the pool and external connections are in development.
Human-Side Protocol is a public draft for discussion and joint development, not yet an operational external infrastructure.
International conversations are underway. They do not imply established partnerships or adoption of the protocol. Speed, resource savings and benefits for participants still need to be tested on real tasks.
One day, I would like to see all these ideas come together not only in technology, but in one real place.
I am curious about life itself — how people think, learn, create and find each other. I want to bring these ideas to a place where knowledge, research, technology and everyday life can develop together.
A City of Knowledge is my long-term aspiration: to try to bring this connection into the real world.
Perhaps, in thirteen years, this will become a small “Instruction Manual for Life” — 366 pages and seven chapters. For now, we are building a system people will be able to use.